Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> Package: lists.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> murphy keeps sending out bogus error messages for all my mails that I
>> send to debian-user-german, and I'm not the only person to experience
>> that. Here's a copy of the "bounce" I got - but in fact the mail is
>> delivered nevertheless:
>
> I'm not a listmater, but I see this in the quoted bounce:
>
> From: "Frank Küster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> which is probably incorrect.
>
> Surprisingly, in the mail to which I'm replying right now I see this:
>
> From: Frank =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=BCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> which seems acceptable.
>
> Can you tell your MUA to use the second form?
I did - the strange thing is that murphy *did* actually deliver the
mail, and when it arrived here it had a correctly encoded From line (I'm
attaching it). It seems murphy somehow is fooled by whatever.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
BABYL OPTIONS: -*- rmail -*-
Version: 5
Labels:
Note: This is the header of an rmail file.
Note: If you are seeing it in rmail,
Note: it means the file has no messages in it.
0, unseen,,
*** EOOH ***
X-From-Line: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 11 15:04:57 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:04:57 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ewgav-0004vo-MD
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:04:57 +0100
Received: from pop.1und1.com [212.227.15.161]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:04:57 +0100
(CET)
Received: from [146.82.138.6] (helo=murphy.debian.org)
by mx.kundenserver.de (node=mxeu10) with ESMTP (Nemesis),
id 0MKu60-1EwgNH2sBA-0003hI for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 Jan 2006
14:50:52 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id B56FF2DFF9; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:50:41 -0600 (CST)
Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Received: from idmailgate1.unizh.ch (idmailgate1.unizh.ch [130.60.127.100])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC0C2E085
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:50:38
-0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost ([130.60.169.159])
by idmailgate1.unizh.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id
k0BDoaFe024323
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:50:36
+0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain)
by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EwgO2-0004gU-Jv
for [email protected]; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:51:38 +0100
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: binutils
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Hartmut Figge's message of
"Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:22:39 +0100")
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:51:38 +0100
X-Gnus-Mail-Source: file:/var/mail/frank
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Rc-Virus: 2005-11-10_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2005-09-11_01
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on murphy.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,IMPRONONCABLE_1,
MURPHY_WRONG_WORD2,UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY autolearn=no version=3.0.3
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [email protected]
X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/162007
X-Loop: [email protected]
List-Id: <debian-user-german.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:50:41 -0600 (CST)
X-SpamScore: 0
Lines: 21
Xref: localhost.localdomain mail.Debian:55529
Hartmut Figge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gru=DF,
>
> fr=FCher hatte ich hier schon einmal beklagt, dass eine Compilation von
> SeaMonkey unter Sid mit dem gcc-3.3 fehlschl=E4gt, wenn man ein aktuelles
> binutils verwendet.
>
> Rettung war eine =E4ltere Version, binutils_2.16.1-3_i386.deb.
>
> Bei Sid gilt jetzt 'gcc-4.0 depends on binutils (>=3D 2.16.1cvs20051214)'.
Hast du einen bugreport gegen binutils gemacht?
Gru=DF, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
