Hi, Andriy Grytsenko wrote: > I completely agree with blaming upstream to be ignorant
Definitely. > so renaming the package would be wise when working with such > upstream. What about yscreensaver? ;-) > I also think this bug severity is 'important', not 'normal' since it > affects usability of package, at least it confuses users. If I was the > maintainer of this package then I would raise the severity. I've allowed myself to bump the severity to important. It's also already mentioned in #debian-devel's /topic. That usually only happens with bugs with a heavy impact (independent of being trivial to fix or not). Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE