On 2016-03-07 10:17, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.22.html > > On 07/03/16 01:19, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Dear release team, > > > > We would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.22. It is currently > > available in experimental and has been built successfully on all > > official architectures except hurd-i386. We have fixed the alpha and > > hurd-i386 failures in our git, and we believe the hppa, sparc64 and > > x32 issues are due to a misconfiguration of the experimental chroots > > (the default compiler in the chroots is gcc-6). Therefore the next > > upload should build everywhere. > > > > As the glibc is using symbol versioning, there is no soname change. That > > said a few packages are using libc internal symbols and have to be > > rebuilt for this transition: > > - apitrace > > - bro > > - dante > > - libnih > > - libnss-db > > - unscd > > > > Here is the corresponding ben file: > > > > title = "glibc"; > > is_affected = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<</; > > is_good = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.23\)/; > > is_bad = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.22\)/; > > > > In addition to that, a few new symbols have been added that might > > prevent a few other packages to transition to testing if they pick up > > the new symbols. They are very few of them, however packages built with > > "-fopenmp -ffast-math" might pick a dependency on the new libmvec > > library on amd64 and x32. > > You can go ahead as soon as you're ready.
Thanks for the quick answer, I have just uploaded it to unstable. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
