Control: tags -1 confirmed Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.22.html
On 07/03/16 01:19, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear release team, > > We would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.22. It is currently > available in experimental and has been built successfully on all > official architectures except hurd-i386. We have fixed the alpha and > hurd-i386 failures in our git, and we believe the hppa, sparc64 and > x32 issues are due to a misconfiguration of the experimental chroots > (the default compiler in the chroots is gcc-6). Therefore the next > upload should build everywhere. > > As the glibc is using symbol versioning, there is no soname change. That > said a few packages are using libc internal symbols and have to be > rebuilt for this transition: > - apitrace > - bro > - dante > - libnih > - libnss-db > - unscd > > Here is the corresponding ben file: > > title = "glibc"; > is_affected = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<</; > is_good = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.23\)/; > is_bad = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.22\)/; > > In addition to that, a few new symbols have been added that might > prevent a few other packages to transition to testing if they pick up > the new symbols. They are very few of them, however packages built with > "-fopenmp -ffast-math" might pick a dependency on the new libmvec > library on amd64 and x32. You can go ahead as soon as you're ready. Cheers, Emilio
