On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 at 13:09:34 +0000, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
> maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might
> break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
> against these packages.
It looks as though there are no rdeps, so a transition is only needed
if the maintainer considers it necessary:
smcv@coccia:~$ dak rm -R -n cvc3
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
cvc3 | 2.4.1-5 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
cvc3-el | 2.4.1-5 | all
libcvc3-5 | 2.4.1-5 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
libcvc3-5-java | 2.4.1-5 | all
libcvc3-5-jni | 2.4.1-5 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
libcvc3-dev | 2.4.1-5 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
Maintainer: Morgan Deters <mdet...@morgandeters.com>
------------------- Reason -------------------
----------------------------------------------
Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
