On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 at 13:10:01 +0000, Matthias Klose wrote:
>  - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
>    maintainers decision if a transition is needed.  However this might
>    break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
>    against these packages.

Looks as though there are no reverse dependencies:

smcv@coccia:~$ dak rm -R -n gemanx-gtk2
Will remove the following packages from unstable:

gemanx-gtk2 |  0.1.0.3-2 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, 
mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
libgemanx-core0 |  0.1.0.3-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, 
powerpc, ppc64el, s390x

Maintainer: Debian Chinese Team <chinese-develop...@lists.alioth.debian.org>

------------------- Reason -------------------

----------------------------------------------

Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to