On 13.07.2015 20:26, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 19:43 +0200, Philipp Huebner wrote:
>> The init script is basically just a wrapper around ejabberdctl, so
>> yes.
> Well that's the point...
> 
> As you say the init script is just a wrapper...
> 
> So shouldn't we stick with the native upstream name for the config file
> (i.e. ejabberdctl.cfg) and drop the symlink altogether, or make at
> least /etc/default/ejabberd the symlink?

No. It's changed already for Jessie which is fixed at this point in
time, I don't see any benefit in switching back with the next release.

ejabberdctl serves as the actual init script for ejabberd, so IMO
/etc/default/ejabberd is perfectly fine, especially if you look at
what's configured inside: absolute basic settings like the location of
the pid-file or the location of the config-file.

Plus a symlink in /etc/default/ would probably confuse the hell out of
the config file handling.

Regards,
-- 
 .''`.   Philipp Huebner <debala...@debian.org>
: :'  :  pgp fp: 6719 25C5 B8CD E74A 5225  3DF9 E5CA 8C49 25E4 205F
`. `'`
  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to