@pkg-sdl: Please have a look at the post/patches linked to in the second paragraph. :)
Am Dienstag, den 30.06.2015, 12:11 +0200 schrieb Alexandre Detiste: > Fabian: I guess we don't want to package 2 engines that are 99% > the same thing in Debian. Nope, of course not. I'd prefer the engine being able to auto-detect the requested game mode and act accordingly. If we end up with two builds with slightly different CFLAGS or #defines, as we do with wolf4sdl, I could live with that as well, though. > Well, I don't know the whole story, but if there really is something > broken in SDL_mixer, I'd rather have it fixed upstream for all games. His patches were posted on the upstream dev list, but got no response so far: http://lists.libsdl.org/pipermail/sdl-libsdl.org/2015-June/098221.html I guess upstream considers SDL*-1.2 dead and does not accept any patches anymore. :( But maybe our SDL packagers at Debian could use some of them. I am thus including them in CC. :) - Fabian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
