Control: tags -1 - moreinfo

On 09/12/14 20:08, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:23:23PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>> Dec  9 18:07:17 processing /resiprocate_1.9.7-2_amd64.changes Dec
>>> 9 18:07:17 /resiprocate_1.9.7-2_amd64.changes is already present on
>>> target host: Dec  9 18:07:17 sipdialer_1.9.7-2_amd64.deb Dec  9
>>> 18:07:17 Job resiprocate_1.9.7-2_amd64.changes removed.
>>>
>>> Don't reuse the same debian revision.
>>
>> That was another attempt to upload the same 1:1.9.7-2 artifacts
>>
>> I notice that it didn't put the epoch in the filenames but it is in
>> the changes file
>>
>> 1:1.9.7-2 was originally uploaded at 14:01
> 
> Julien suggested to try again with 1:1.9.7-3. Some tools get confused when
> there is both a 1.9.7-2 and a 1:1.9.7-2 (with the same filenames, as the epoch
> is not in the filename). Uploading -3 should avoid that issue.
> 
> Also, if you want to upload 1.9.8 to experimental, it's probably best to
> version it as 1:1.9.8-2 to avoid the same issue.
> 

Ok, thanks for the feedback, 1:1.9.7-3 has been uploaded signed by the
other key and I've pushed the subkey with the extended expiry.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to