Hi Daniel,

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 07:23:23PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > Dec  9 18:07:17 processing /resiprocate_1.9.7-2_amd64.changes Dec
> > 9 18:07:17 /resiprocate_1.9.7-2_amd64.changes is already present on
> > target host: Dec  9 18:07:17 sipdialer_1.9.7-2_amd64.deb Dec  9
> > 18:07:17 Job resiprocate_1.9.7-2_amd64.changes removed.
> > 
> > Don't reuse the same debian revision.
> 
> That was another attempt to upload the same 1:1.9.7-2 artifacts
> 
> I notice that it didn't put the epoch in the filenames but it is in
> the changes file
> 
> 1:1.9.7-2 was originally uploaded at 14:01

Julien suggested to try again with 1:1.9.7-3. Some tools get confused when
there is both a 1.9.7-2 and a 1:1.9.7-2 (with the same filenames, as the epoch
is not in the filename). Uploading -3 should avoid that issue.

Also, if you want to upload 1.9.8 to experimental, it's probably best to
version it as 1:1.9.8-2 to avoid the same issue.

Cheers,

Ivo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to