El Tue, 6 de May 2014 a las 8:41 PM, Bdale Garbee <bd...@gag.com>
escribió:
Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> writes:
I can see your point that the future of upstart is possibly
unclear, but
my feeling is that if anyone filed a bug against a package
requesting
upstart support, that's sufficient indication of interest to merge
upstart support patches, including this sort of minor modification
of the init script.
I agree.
From your other message I was under the impression that you thought it
was ok to remove Upstart support, but now you agree that if there was
interest, then it should be kept (as long as it does not cause issues).
Is the maintainer supposed to accept the support then remove it a few
months later :) ? Are those interested in Upstart support supposed to
hawk over packages and never get a wink of sleep? I do not think that
is what you want, but the wording of your other message (that you would
not be surprised if upstart support was removed) seems like it is.
Would you mind clarifying a little?
Thanks y buenos noches,
--
Cameron Norman
