Hi Ralf, >> please refer to: >> https://www.mail-archive.com/policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de/msg00721.html >> >> the current behaviour is disired and expected. You must let the NULL-sender >> (mainly generated >> by DSNs) pass/accept no matter what the policy says. > > That was an interesting read, thanks for the pointer. However, > unfortunately the question why DSNs should be treated any different than > normal Mail was raised, but not answered in that thread. In other words: > Why should I let a server that's on 4 blacklists, and from which I block > all mail, allow to submit DSNs to my server? In particular considering > that I do not use DNSs at all, so I know every incoming DSN is forged.
Thanks for your reply. The current policyd-weight implementation honors the NULL-sender, passes emails with NULL-sender address and does not privide a possibiliy to change this behaviour, e.g. by config option. If you want to be able to change this behaviour (treating the NULL-sender address like every other address), please provide a patch for it. I assume most people do use DSNs. Regards, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
