Hi Werner, > please refer to: > https://www.mail-archive.com/policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de/msg00721.html > > the current behaviour is disired and expected. You must let the NULL-sender > (mainly generated > by DSNs) pass/accept no matter what the policy says.
That was an interesting read, thanks for the pointer. However, unfortunately the question why DSNs should be treated any different than normal Mail was raised, but not answered in that thread. In other words: Why should I let a server that's on 4 blacklists, and from which I block all mail, allow to submit DSNs to my server? In particular considering that I do not use DNSs at all, so I know every incoming DSN is forged. Kind regards Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
