On 04-Jan-2014, tony mancill wrote: > On 01/04/2014 07:07 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > > […] the binary ‘closure-compiler’ package will not be empty. It will > > need to install files distinct from the ‘libclosure-compiler-java’ > > package. > > Currently, that manpage would be the only file in the binary package, as > /usr/bin/closure-compiler will remain a symlink to the executable jar, so > it's still going to be a very small package.
A small package shouldn't be a problem, if the package serves a purpose distinct from any other package. Since the binary ‘closure-compiler’ package will have distinct dependencies from the dependencies of the other binary packages, be in a separate section of the archive, etc. the small size shouldn't disqualify it from entry into the archive. -- \ “A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. | `\ Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in | _o__) principle is always a vice.” —Thomas Paine | Ben Finney <b...@benfinney.id.au>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
