On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:37:30AM +1300, Olly Betts wrote: > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:18:59AM +1300, Olly Betts wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:26:42AM +1300, Olly Betts wrote: > > > Looking at the source of 0.21.2, the flag is now checked (I haven't > > > yet verified if the --nopict option works). Looks like the fix was > > > probably made in 0.20.4, as NEWS says: > > > > > > 0.20.4: nopict mode bug fixes > > > > Thanks for the recent upload of 0.21.2-1 to experimental, Willi. I'm > > not able to download it yet it seems, so I can't test, but I suspect > > this bug was fixed by it too... > > Ah, but I can test vanilla upstream 0.21.2, and that does indeed have a > working --nopict option.
I can also confirm that the soon to be released 0.21.3 has a working --nopict option. Dave > > If you need a way to test, then there's a suitable file in the testsuite: > > $ unrtf --nopict tests/pict.rtf >/dev/null 2>&1 > $ ls -l *.wmf > -rw-r--r-- 1 olly olly 573864 Dec 26 10:33 pict001.wmf > $ rm *.wmf > $ src/unrtf --nopict tests/pict.rtf >/dev/null 2>&1 > $ ls -l *.wmf > ls: cannot access *.wmf: No such file or directory > > Cheers, > Olly -- David F. Davey D'Entrecasteaux Phone: +61 3 6267 4852 378 Manuka Road Mobile: +61 428 674 852 Kettering Fax: +61 3 6267 4791 Tasmania 7155 Australia da...@windclimber.id.au -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
