On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:18:59AM +1300, Olly Betts wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:26:42AM +1300, Olly Betts wrote:
> > Looking at the source of 0.21.2, the flag is now checked (I haven't
> > yet verified if the --nopict option works). Looks like the fix was
> > probably made in 0.20.4, as NEWS says:
> >
> > 0.20.4: nopict mode bug fixes
>
> Thanks for the recent upload of 0.21.2-1 to experimental, Willi. I'm
> not able to download it yet it seems, so I can't test, but I suspect
> this bug was fixed by it too...
Ah, but I can test vanilla upstream 0.21.2, and that does indeed have a
working --nopict option.
If you need a way to test, then there's a suitable file in the testsuite:
$ unrtf --nopict tests/pict.rtf >/dev/null 2>&1
$ ls -l *.wmf
-rw-r--r-- 1 olly olly 573864 Dec 26 10:33 pict001.wmf
$ rm *.wmf
$ src/unrtf --nopict tests/pict.rtf >/dev/null 2>&1
$ ls -l *.wmf
ls: cannot access *.wmf: No such file or directory
Cheers,
Olly
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
