Hi, On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 10:32:26AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > This sequence often fails: > > $ libreoffice & > $ libreoffice /tmp/something.odt; rm /tmp/something.odt
And why are you doing that then? Sorry, I'd understand it in the second case, but... What happens without that first "libreoffice &"? > This is because the second command signals LO to open the document and then > returns immediately, instead of waiting for the file to be actually opened. Of course it tells the already running process to open the file. What else? There is _no_ "different libreoffice instances". > This is bad because some email programs open attachments that way (mutt for > instance). In effect, I cannot open an LO attachment from within mutt; > instead I have to store it to /tmp and then open it, manually. I *think* it's ooplash.bins fault. In OOo times we had a patch which prevented this by inventing a new option -no-oosplash (used in .mime) which we didn't take over for LO apparently. And now it's too late for wheezy so it'll probably be only fixed for wheezy+1... Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
