Le Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:18:44 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On mer., 2012-03-21 at 11:16 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > Well actually this is not that easy. The call to the pam module > > should be done in two phases. > > > > > If it's not that easy I'd rather not mess up by adding crap to lightdm > pam config, and I really think it should be done carefully by someone > which actually cares about SELinux... As said by vorlon[0], we should have uniform behavior across all programs that allow a user to login. Other distributions (Fedora/RHEL/...) are already doing this for the DMs, I guess their pam file could be used as an example. Cheers Laurent Bigonville [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/03/msg00527.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
