On mer., 2012-03-21 at 11:16 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Well actually this is not that easy. The call to the pam module should
> be done in two phases.
> 
> 
If it's not that easy I'd rather not mess up by adding crap to lightdm
pam config, and I really think it should be done carefully by someone
which actually cares about SELinux...
-- 
Yves-Alexis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



Reply via email to