On 20:11, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > (Just wonder if there's any sense in the kernel package having a > Recommends on the updated userland?)
Actually never mind. We already have the inverse of this; a new kernel image set a Breaks: on versions of userland packages too old to properly boot the system, and this ensures they get upgraded. I /think/ that's okay and desirable. Clearly the updated userland needs to stay barely functional until the new kernel is actually booted, and that's one of the reasons we can't do the inverse (set a Breaks: in freebsd-net-tools). Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140926193041.gb18...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
