Wouldn't this be fixed somewhat simply if freebsd-net-tools had a depends: kfreebsd-image-10? So even though freebsd-image-9 gets removed due the breaks, the user will at least have the newer kernel and a bootable system.
This does differ from linux dist-upgrades where it is expected that the current kernel not go away, but that's possible due to their avoidance of ABI breakage. Since freebsd doesn't have that goal, maybe forced kernel dist-upgrade will be simply unavoidable? Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mp4zojxr5ikwdpr8czq-mizwafevlx4t0sytmjhpkh...@mail.gmail.com
