* Robert Millan (r...@debian.org) [140214 00:11]: > On 12/02/2014 20:06, Niels Thykier wrote: > > As I see it, there are two concrete problems with the (number of) > > supported packages. First, the number of packages actually built on > > kFreeBSD is just shy of 90%, whereas most other release architectures > > are at 96%[1]. Here kFreeBSD has increased in the past quarter from > > ~89.5% to "almost, but not quite 90%". > > The release architecture criteria [1] says the target is 98% but > hardware-specific packages are excluded. Does this apply to kernel > ports by simply replacing "hardware-specific" with "kernel-specific"? > > [1] https://release.debian.org/jessie/arch_policy.html
At the time where we wrote that criteria there wasn't a difference - basically "packages which don't make a sense don't need to be ported" was the main thought. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140214204245.gh16...@mails.so.argh.org
