On 23/12/2013 00:03, Robert Millan wrote: > On 21/12/2013 22:31, Markus Koschany wrote: >> On 20.12.2013 13:29, Robert Millan wrote: >> [...] >>> If you've got spare time to do some tests, it would help to know which >>> version >>> of the kfreebsd-11 package introduced this bug. >> >> I downloaded the first and second kernel image for kfreebsd-11 amd64 >> from snapshots.debian.org: >> >> svn256281-1 works >> svn258494-1 fails
Regression found: $ svn-bisect good Regression found! Last good revision: r257690 First bad revision: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r257692 | glebius | 2013-11-05 08:44:15 +0100 (dt, 05 nov 2013) | 14 lines Rewrite in_control(), so that it is comprehendable without getting mad. o Provide separate functions for SIOCAIFADDR and for SIOCDIFADDR, with clear code flow from beginning to the end. After that the rest of in_control() gets very small and clear. o Provide sx(9) lock to protect against parallel ioctl() invocations. o Reimplement logic from r201282, that tried to keep localhost route in table when multiple P2P interfaces with same local address are created and deleted. Discussed with: pluknet, melifaro Sponsored by: Netflix Sponsored by: Nginx, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I'm not sure what's going on. Perhaps it has to do with the last bit (about keeping localhost route in table). Maybe the problem goes away when updating freebsd-net-tools to 10.x... -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52c595fc.7000...@debian.org
