Hi, On 05/11/13 18:50, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Tue, 05 Nov 2013, Don Armstrong wrote: >> This sounds like a case where we should turn these usertags into fully >> fledged tags. [Or alternatively, they should just be made usertags under >> the debian-po...@lists.debian.org user or similar.]
Either of those sounds good. Fully-fledged tags would be the easiest for most reporters to remember to use, but I wonder if this pollutes the tag namespace. > [Or multiple pseudopackages.] > > Something like i386.ports.debian.org or similar would work, with each > current port getting a pseudopackage, and the maintainer of the > pseudopackage being the ports list. Would that be only for generic issues with a port, not specific to a package? I doubt this would be used much. These bugs might typically be reassigned to kernel packages or eglibc anyway. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/527949c5.8040...@pyro.eu.org
