On 2013-11-03 15:49, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Niels Thykier dixit: > >> [...] >> Until we have a clear definition of "actively maintained ports", I would >> recommend porters to err on the side of being verbose over being silent. > > I’ve held off on the m68k side because I think the role call was only > for architectures in the main archive, right? >
Yes, we are only talking about architectures in the main architecture. >> [1] Nothing official yet, but gcc-4.6 (and earlier) /might/ not be >> acceptable as a default for Jessie. > > Didn't Doko say he’d want 4.8? We (on the m68k side) are putting > effort into that one, since 4.7 appears to only be used by eglibc > right now. And 4.6 for GNAT, but gnat-4.8 is new, and the ICE may > be fixed as there’s active upstream on the GCC/m68k side. > > bye, > //mirabilos > I am not entirely up to speed on what he wants; I am still waiting for him to get back to me (see [1]). ~Niels [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2013/10/msg00710.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/527671af.7050...@thykier.net
