Hi.
Some ideas on what could be done:
- Fast-track 9.1 by uploading it immediately to unstable, then upload
9.2 (at least kernel) to experimental.
- Skip 9.1 completely and upload 9.2 to experimental right away while
leaving 9.0 in unstable.
- Don't bother with early adoption of 9.2. Finish the 9.1 transition
smoothly by keeping it in experimental for a reasonable period, then
uploading to unstable and waiting for jessie migration. Once it's
done, then put 9.2 in experimental (which will most likely be the
final 9.2-RELEASE by that time).
So what to do? Please share your thoughts!
All these options have pros and cons ;-)
It mainly depends how much time you have for it.
I like the slightly altered 1st option - just wait a week
before move 9.1 bits from experimental into unstable.
Of course freebsd-manpages could track stable-9 immediately ;-)
Petr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/alpine.lnx.2.00.1307181039430.3...@contest.felk.cvut.cz
