Hi Petr, On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:00:59PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > >Should I assume from your updating expected results in SVN that you're > >dangerously close to declaring this "good enough for upload"? I'm > >still waiting on all the other arches to finish, so we don't get any > >more surprises, but we should be close to ready to do -2 and wash our > >hands of this, while I apologize profusely for surprise transitions. > > I am building it on kfreebsd-amd64. > 64-bit pass builds and the regression match what I updated into SVN. > 32-bit pass builds and fails more. At least tst-xmmymm.out have to > be fixed, rebuild again in progress. As the whole package have not > yet build, I have not yet test it by installing into chroot. > > Please, could you try to build it on kfreebsd-i386 before next > upload into unstable ? Eventually upload into experimental with > relaxed version dependency on gcc-4.7 might be good idea also for > other architectures. >
Thanks, a lot for your help. I have tried to build eglibc from SVN on both kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386, I only have a small problem with stubs.h on kfreebsd-amd64. I am working on a fix. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130511074055.gp31...@hall.aurel32.net
