On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:59:11PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > >This isn't something new, but people tends to be busy and have to set > >priorities. I personally didn't know that the deadline was two days > >after the release, and I think it was the same for other people who > >could have fix that. I still don't understand why this sudden rush. > > > >>most of the fixes required were really quite trivial (though we're not > >>quite done yet). > > > >True, but the build still fails early. And the testsuite hasn't run yet. > > With the current SVN, it builds, but it does not work. > The dynamic linker does not honour suggested library path. > > See in build tree i.e. > > $ ktrace -adi -- > /opt/sid/build/extra/eglibc-2.17/build-tree/kfreebsd-amd64-libc/elf/ld-kfreebsd-x86-64.so.1 > --library-path > /opt/sid/build/extra/eglibc-2.17/build-tree/kfreebsd-amd64-libc/ /bin/true > $ kdump | grep NAMI > > Currently, I do not have more time to spend on it, sorry. >
Thanks a lot for working on that. I'll try to look at it in the next days. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130508170348.gd31...@hall.aurel32.net
