On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 08:45:52AM -0800, Michael Graff wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tuesday 02 December 2003 07:58 am, Robert Millan wrote: > > > No, we combine the advantages of Debian, GNU, and the kernel of NetBSD. > > > > The superiority of GNU userland repect to NetBSD's is an issue too, and you > > seem to be ignoring it. > > I'm sorry, but this I have to respond to.
No reason to be sorry for that. > I don't see the GNU userland as supperior. I see it as annoying. GNU isn't > better, just different. And those differences drive me nuts. Well I guess I should learn to keep statements I'm not willing to defend for myself. I'm not really interested on discussing this. > But, that asside... what you have been proposing seems to be taking NetBSD > and removing all but the kernel. In that case, it's not NetBSD anymore. You're right. The system is basicaly a GNU variant with another kernel. > That aside, insulting a group you're trying to work with seems > counter-productive. I didn't mean to insult. That was just my perspective. > Are you certain you're not Stallman in disguise? Heh. You caught me ;). If you insist on that I'll have to start signing my mail *g*. -- Robert Millan "[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work." -- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion)
