Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While I'd dearly love to see a bit more de-coupling of NetBSD kernel and > libc (so that they don't have to be in quite such lockstep, though I'm more > worried about the process utilities that must be *exact* matches), I don't > claim that managing it would be trivial, and may not even be practical (or > at least, might not be feasible short of 3.0).
BTW, NetBSD gets a lot out of the tight integration of the libraries and kernel. What we get is completely seamless integration -- and that buys us quite a bit. In general, I can see why one would want to combine the advantages of Debian and NetBSD, but I can't see why one would want to produce something less functional than either. I think if you replace too much of NetBSD in doing what you're trying to do, you just end up with a crippled Linux rather than something synergetic. Perry
