* Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061220 14:42]: > On Wednesday 20 December 2006 08:35, Andreas Barth wrote: > > I have yet to see the dataloss. Anyways, bugs being important doesn't > > mean they are not allowed to be fixed (and I would let such an fix > > still to Etch currently), but I don't think we should wait on the fix. > > So I'm downgrading to important. > > The dataloss is there, though not in the conventional sense: the file > itself is correct, but using busybox zcat or gunzip only part of it is > extracted so from a user PoV data is "lost". > > Then why not leave it at RC and tag it etchignore. IMO that would better > fit this issue.
If you want, you can do it (IOW, this is a direct approval of using etch-ignore by you in this case). Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
