On Wednesday 20 December 2006 08:35, Andreas Barth wrote: > I have yet to see the dataloss. Anyways, bugs being important doesn't > mean they are not allowed to be fixed (and I would let such an fix > still to Etch currently), but I don't think we should wait on the fix. > So I'm downgrading to important.
The dataloss is there, though not in the conventional sense: the file itself is correct, but using busybox zcat or gunzip only part of it is extracted so from a user PoV data is "lost". Then why not leave it at RC and tag it etchignore. IMO that would better fit this issue. Cheers, FJP
pgpoag2WOUddb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
