On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:54:39AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 03 November 2006 11:33, Sven Luther wrote: > > Ah, i thought there was some automatic tool, or whatever, so much for > > me, next time i will make sure to CC debian-boot or something, that > > Please discuss it on the list _before_ you file a bug report. > > > said i was kill-filled by most of you guys, so i was not sure how > > useful it is. Now, apparently you are not kill-filling me anymore :) > > I have _never_ kill-filed you for listmail. > > > BTW, i still don't understand the problem with non-di-image low > > priority additional .udebs. > > Read again my answer to Otavio. It is in there. > The udeb section was created specifically for Debian Installer. IMO that > means that the d-i team has veto rights over anything that goes in there.
Ok, fine and all. But that gives absolutely no hint on why you would veto it, which is what i am asking. It is not easy to discuss things, if you get non-reply, and "that is the way it is and accept it" kind of replies, nor if you need to make 2-3 exchanges of emails in order to even get the question to get noticed. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
