On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Joey Hess wrote: > > I don't recall having ever threatened you of "enforcement" or with the > > "tech-ctte". I recall I did claim people should bring it to the ctte > > if they disagree with my decision at the end of the discussion though, > > as I did again lately. > They were in the mail I replied to.
You were quoting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> where I said "I'm not too happy that I can't enforce my decision". This is not even remotely threatening of "enforcing" anything towards you or tasksel... I also mentionned the tech-ctte as in: "I really wish my Recommends would be honored (or debated in the tech-ctte)", this means I wish that the discussion on pulling or not avahi is made by the tech ctte if some people object to it; this had nothing to do with discussing the support of Recommends in tasksel in the tech-ctte. I'm afraid you got me wrong, and I'm sure that if you read the message again in this light, you shouldn't see any threat whatsoever. > The technical committe unfortunatly has a history of delaying and > complicating issues, and not much of a history of solving them. As I said, at least we are not losing time in useless flamewars. I prefer a delay due to latency of other people -- during which I can do other things -- than pointlessly repeating the arguments over and over as happened on that particular issue on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I was part of the drift towards a flamewar myself, and don't wish that to happen anymore. -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
