Hi, On Thu, Aug 31, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: > i did some testing today compiling gtk+ from CVS HEAD against > libcairo-directfb2 (1.2.4-1) and libdirectfb-0.9-25 (0.9.25.1-3) and it > turns out that > > - a fresher DirectFB than the latest release (0.9.25.1); I hope the > > DirectFB maintainer has the time to prepare a snapshot for > > experimental as requested in Debian #383238 > this is no longer a problem, as GTK+ >= 2.10.2 selectively excludes from > compilation all the code that needs DFB >= 0.9.26 to work (minimum > requirement is now DFB 0.9.24)
Yes, actually I continued working on Gtk 2.10.0 in our SVN but backported the needed delta from Gtk's CVS back then (this was before the relevant Gtk release). This is in pkg-gnome's SVN since 10 days or so. > > - to rebuild the DirectFB flavor of Cairo with --enable-pdf and > > --enable-ps as requested in Debian #383297 > still awaiting the patch to be applied, currently GTK+ from HEAD does > not compile against DFB flavour of cairo from debian packages because of > lack of PDF and PS support. Indeed, I hadn't any new from Dave Beckett either. Dave, would you mind if I NMU libcairo with the proposed changes perhaps to experimental if you so prefer? > > - to rebuild Cairo against the new DirectFB which changes SONAME, I > > hope an upload to experimental will be possible once DirectFB is > > uploaded but I've not requested that yet > current cairo-directfb depends from DFB 0.9.25, so i guess this is solved ? Correct, this was only required because of the first point. Bye, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
