Loïc Minier wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
i did some testing today compiling gtk+ from CVS HEAD against
libcairo-directfb2 (1.2.4-1) and libdirectfb-0.9-25 (0.9.25.1-3) and it
turns out that
- a fresher DirectFB than the latest release (0.9.25.1); I hope the
DirectFB maintainer has the time to prepare a snapshot for
experimental as requested in Debian #383238
this is no longer a problem, as GTK+ >= 2.10.2 selectively excludes from
compilation all the code that needs DFB >= 0.9.26 to work (minimum
requirement is now DFB 0.9.24)
Yes, actually I continued working on Gtk 2.10.0 in our SVN but
backported the needed delta from Gtk's CVS back then (this was before
the relevant Gtk release). This is in pkg-gnome's SVN since 10 days or
so.
The GDKDFB backend found in GTK+ 2.10.2 contains many very important
enhancements and fixes Mike Emmel introduced Fri Aug 11, which are not
found in earlier (2.10.0, 2.10.1) GTK+ relases.
I strongly suggest to skip GTK+ 2.10.0 and 2.10.1 and jump directly to
GTK+ 2.10.2.
<snip/>
- to rebuild Cairo against the new DirectFB which changes SONAME, I
hope an upload to experimental will be possible once DirectFB is
uploaded but I've not requested that yet
current cairo-directfb depends from DFB 0.9.25, so i guess this is solved ?
Correct, this was only required because of the first point.
cool! :)
Attilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
