Your message dated Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:25:53 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#281923: Install report: successfull
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 2004 16:03:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 18 08:03:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (host01.pcaserver.com) [195.32.84.175]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CUokU-0001t0-00; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:03:06 -0800
Received: (qmail 2667 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2004 16:01:40 -0000
Received: from pcaserver.com (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1)
by pcaserver.com with SMTP; 18 Nov 2004 16:01:40 -0000
Received: from cacheng.unige.ch (cacheng.unige.ch [129.194.8.73])
by webmail.pca.it (IMP) with HTTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]@localhost>; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:01:39 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:01:39 +0100
From: Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-to: Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Install report: successfull
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2
X-Originating-IP: 129.194.8.73
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 20041115,
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20041115/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux vert 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Nov 11 12:18:43 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 20041115, 12-16
Method: booted with 'linux26', installed via manually configured network (using
http://mirror.switch.ch) and no proxy
Machine: a manually assembled machine, based on a Micro Star MS-6373 (K7N420
Pro) motherboard
(http://www.msicomputer.com/product/p_spec.asp?model=K7N420_Pro)
Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2000+
Memory: 512MB PQI DDR-266
Root Device: IDE, Maxtor 32049H2, 20GB
Root Size/partition table:
vert:/# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/hda: 20.4 GB, 20491075584 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 39704 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 1 38018 19161040+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda2 38019 39704 849744 f W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hda5 38019 39704 849712+ 82 Linux swap /
Solaris
Disk /dev/hdb: 20.5 GB, 20520493056 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 39761 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hdb1 1 39761 20039512+ 83 Linux
vert:/# mount
/dev/hda1 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
proc on /proc type proc (rw)
sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)
usbfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
vert:/# cat /etc/fstab
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# <file system> <mount point> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
/dev/hda1 / ext3 defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1
/dev/hda5 none swap sw 0 0
/dev/hdc /media/cdrom0 iso9660 ro,user,noauto 0 0
/dev/fd0 /media/floppy0 auto rw,user,noauto 0 0
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
vert:/# lspci
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce CPU bridge (rev b2)
0000:00:00.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce 220/420 Memory Controller
(rev b2)
0000:00:00.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce 220/420 Memory Controller
(rev b2)
0000:00:00.3 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce 420 Memory Controller
(DDR)
(rev b2)
0000:00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce ISA Bridge (rev c3)
0000:00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation nForce PCI System Management (rev c1)
0000:00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce USB Controller (rev
c3)
0000:00:03.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce USB Controller (rev
c3)
0000:00:04.0 Ethernet controller: nVidia Corporation nForce Ethernet
Controller (rev c2)
0000:00:05.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device
01b0 (rev c2)
0000:00:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation nForce Audio
(rev
c2)
0000:00:08.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce PCI-to-PCI bridge (rev c2)
0000:00:09.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation nForce IDE (rev c3)
0000:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce AGP to PCI Bridge (rev b2)
0000:01:00.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41)
0000:01:00.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 41)
0000:01:00.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 02)
0000:01:04.0 Communication controller: Conexant HSF 56k Data/Fax Modem (rev
01)
0000:02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NVCrush11
[GeForce2
MX Integrated Graphics] (rev b1)
vert:/# lspci -n
0000:00:00.0 0600: 10de:01a4 (rev b2)
0000:00:00.1 0500: 10de:01ac (rev b2)
0000:00:00.2 0500: 10de:01ad (rev b2)
0000:00:00.3 0500: 10de:01ab (rev b2)
0000:00:01.0 0601: 10de:01b2 (rev c3)
0000:00:01.1 0c05: 10de:01b4 (rev c1)
0000:00:02.0 0c03: 10de:01c2 (rev c3)
0000:00:03.0 0c03: 10de:01c2 (rev c3)
0000:00:04.0 0200: 10de:01c3 (rev c2)
0000:00:05.0 0401: 10de:01b0 (rev c2)
0000:00:06.0 0401: 10de:01b1 (rev c2)
0000:00:08.0 0604: 10de:01b8 (rev c2)
0000:00:09.0 0101: 10de:01bc (rev c3)
0000:00:1e.0 0604: 10de:01b7 (rev b2)
0000:01:00.0 0c03: 1033:0035 (rev 41)
0000:01:00.1 0c03: 1033:0035 (rev 41)
0000:01:00.2 0c03: 1033:00e0 (rev 02)
0000:01:04.0 0780: 14f1:2013 (rev 01)
0000:02:00.0 0300: 10de:01a0 (rev b1)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
Comments/Problems: the network was manually configured (no DHCP server
available).
Nothing more to say about the installation itself: on this machine all worked
well and the installation process was very easy. The French transaltion seems
ok
(even if I'm not French mother-language), probably when you choose the method
for the installation, CD-Rom should be left as /CD-Rom/ and not translated as
/cédérom/.
I didn't try to install a desktop environment (I installed later the Xserver,
GNOME and so on, manually selecting the packages I need and X11 automatically
worked with the 'nv' open source driver), but I'd like to have the possibility
to choose singolar component of the desktop environment. Let's say:
[x] Desktop Environment
[x] X server
[x] GNOME
[ ] KDE
I mean, I don't like KDE and I want only GNOME: with the old woody installer
system, if you choose DE to be installed, at the end you have X11, GNOME *and*
KDE, while I'd like to have only X11 and GNOME. If this is already the case,
please excuse me for my comments, while on the contrary this could be an
improvement in the Debian-installer. Obviously, I could choose to install the
DE
and then manually select (or de-select) the KDE packages, but this is something
not user-friendly.
I can provide all the Install logs and other status info (available in
/var/log/debian-installer/), with the lshal output, if needed.
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 281923-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2004 14:26:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 27 06:26:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl (elrond.fjphome.nl)
[195.240.184.66]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CivpI-0003w1-00; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 06:26:24 -0800
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.85] ident=fjp)
by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1Civon-0002cJ-QN
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:25:53 +0100
From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#281923: Install report: successfull
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:25:53 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On Monday 27 December 2004 12:43, Luca Capello wrote:
> as submitter, I suggest to close this bug: the installation process was
> ok and I encountered no problem.
Done.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
