Your message dated Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:50:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Assume fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2004 19:34:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 05 11:34:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pie.crustynet.org.uk [195.188.22.30] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AopGe-00035S-00; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 11:34:28 -0800
Received: by pie.crustynet.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E24E6167AF; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 19:34:23 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 19:34:23 +0000
From: Chris Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Failed installation on old Pentium system
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=DATING,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level:
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: beta 2, downloaded from http.us.debian.org 2004-0=
5-02
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.2-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586 unkn=
own
Date: 2004-05-02 18:10
Method: Booted from floppies, then network install from a local mirror
Machine: Dell OptiPlex 560/L
Processor: Pentium 60
Memory: 32mb
Root Device: 2gb IDE harddrive, /dev/hda
Root Size/partition table: one 2gb ext3 as part1 (/), one 64mb swap as part2
Output of lspci:
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [E]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [E]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
Configuring the network card worked fine (I selected the right module
=66rom the list, and it configured by ISAPNP fine), except I got a message
up telling me that no Ethernet card had been found. It then went on to
configure DHCP, etc, so there doesn't seem to be any actual problem with
the network card configuration.
Another thing was, during the "Retreiving packages" stage, it
occaisionally came up with "Validating %s...", but seemed to carry on
fine.
Once it got to the LILO installation screen, I pressed enter to accept
the default of installing LILO to the MBR. It then cleared the screen,
and restarted d-i, and came back to the same prompt. Looking at /target
on tty2, it seems that no kernel image has been installed, which I guess
is why lilo-installer is failing.
--=20
Chris Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG Key ID: 1024D/D097A261
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAIpq/DzQFd9CXomERAr2fAKCzuRlWBfWbzDkHbNHdtrH/S0nP5QCeL69C
SJ48uLTj2AQSgb+xI9Xskzc=
=YoF9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 231655-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2004 12:53:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 18 05:53:21 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C8eiP-0004vh-00; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 05:53:21 -0700
Received: from aglu.demon.nl ([82.161.38.140]:64947 helo=localhost)
by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1C8eiM-0001fp-0X
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 12:53:20 +0000
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC2C10E0F2
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:50:39 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Assume fixed
From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:50:39 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Three months ago I asked:
> Does the spurious message still appear in the latest daily builds?
No answer, so let's assume that the problem was fixed.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
