Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:54:29 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2004 19:34:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 05 11:34:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pie.crustynet.org.uk [195.188.22.30] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AopGe-00035S-00; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 11:34:28 -0800
Received: by pie.crustynet.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E24E6167AF; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 19:34:23 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 19:34:23 +0000
From: Chris Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Failed installation on old Pentium system
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=DATING,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level:
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: beta 2, downloaded from http.us.debian.org 2004-0=
5-02
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.2-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586 unkn=
own
Date: 2004-05-02 18:10
Method: Booted from floppies, then network install from a local mirror
Machine: Dell OptiPlex 560/L
Processor: Pentium 60
Memory: 32mb
Root Device: 2gb IDE harddrive, /dev/hda
Root Size/partition table: one 2gb ext3 as part1 (/), one 64mb swap as part2
Output of lspci:
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [E]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [E]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
Configuring the network card worked fine (I selected the right module
=66rom the list, and it configured by ISAPNP fine), except I got a message
up telling me that no Ethernet card had been found. It then went on to
configure DHCP, etc, so there doesn't seem to be any actual problem with
the network card configuration.
Another thing was, during the "Retreiving packages" stage, it
occaisionally came up with "Validating %s...", but seemed to carry on
fine.
Once it got to the LILO installation screen, I pressed enter to accept
the default of installing LILO to the MBR. It then cleared the screen,
and restarted d-i, and came back to the same prompt. Looking at /target
on tty2, it seems that no kernel image has been installed, which I guess
is why lilo-installer is failing.
--=20
Chris Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG Key ID: 1024D/D097A261
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAIpq/DzQFd9CXomERAr2fAKCzuRlWBfWbzDkHbNHdtrH/S0nP5QCeL69C
SJ48uLTj2AQSgb+xI9Xskzc=
=YoF9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 231783-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2004 18:54:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 25 10:54:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Aw4Ao-0004rS-00; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:54:22 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-37.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.37])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8D017E56
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:54:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C6ED66F359; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:54:29 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:54:29 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
X-Spam-Level:
--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think that this kernel installation problem has been fixed.
--=20
see shy jo
--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAPO9ld8HHehbQuO8RAuEkAKCevF9NPxSdwTrPh3XrEDgN7y5v0QCgo73m
Kmz0Ygm1AI/l5GmfQMyErOc=
=aVi4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
