On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 06:25:58PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 09:22:57 -0400 > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > arch linux-kernel-di build/config rootskel base-installer > > > hppa 2.4.25 [3] 2.4.25 [3] 2.4.20 [7] 2.4.26 [10] > > > [3] hppa far out of date > > > [7] Obviously this is only a fallback, but 2.4.20?! > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ apt-cache search kernel-image-2.4 | grep 32-smp > kernel-image-2.4.25-32-smp - Linux kernel image for version 2.4.25 on > 32-bit PA-RISC SMP. > kernel-image-2.4.26-32-smp - Linux kernel image for version 2.4.26 on > 32-bit PA-RISC SMP. > kernel-image-2.4.27-32-smp - Linux kernel image for version 2.4.27 on > 32-bit PA-RISC SMP. > > I've grepped 32bit SMP to show only one flavour of each version. I just > don't understand WTH are you complaining about hppa being "far out of > date". I've been releasing each new version in a timely fashion every time > I could.
Joey is referring to the udebs produced by linux-kernel-di-hppa in the debian-installer repository, not the standard kernel-image debs. You can tell this by the way the column was headed "linux-kernel-di". > Now if d-i needs special work of mine to sync with kernel updates, I'd > better be taught about it. It does. There are plenty of examples in the d-i repository. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
