[Christian Perrier] > What you're saying here indeed, is that the nl_NL as well as fr_FR and > so on locales are indeed inconsistent and should *never* be used....
Not quite, but almost. The fr_FR listing in SUPPORTED should not be used, as it uses the ISO-8859-1 charset. But it can not be replaced with an entry using ISO-8859-15 because this would generate incompatibilty problems on existing installations previously using the old fr_FR and suddenly using the new fr_FR. This is why the new [EMAIL PROTECTED] locale name was made. So, yes, fr_FR should be removed, and stay gone for a few years, before it is possible to consider bringing it back to as a locale without ISO-8859-1 charset. > All this goes further : why do we keep these locales if they are not > consistent? Backward compatibility. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
