This is first a followup on a specific topic, which further derives in more general design considerations. Please followup to -boot.
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > ... which is a problem, because what you really want is > > 1) Choose Brazilian Portuguese > 2) Be presented a list of countries associated with this language (pt_BR): > -Brazil > -Other > 3) Choose Other, then choose "Japan" Yeah, I agree. But the problem here is that "Brazilian Portuguese" is currently represented by "pt_BR" while it should be something like "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" while "Classical" portuguese should be "pt" or "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". This one particular issue is really difficult to solve as long as pt_BR is used for representing "Brazilian Portuguese". Brazilian Portuguese is, according to what I've read from both Brazilians and Portugueses, different enough from Portuguese that: -it should be called "Brazilian" -it should have its own ISO-639 code > One more reason why I think the current behavior, where some > languagechooser entries list a country and some do not, is a terrible > inconsistent mess that needs to be fixed. I agree. The current choice was a compromise at the time we introduced the countrychooser/languagechooser dichotomy. My first idea when I proposed it (which was quickly supported by Steve) was that we needed both things: -support all possible configurations (this means choosing all possible es_*, en_* and others locales) -make no "a priori" choices about which countries were mentioned and which weren't I was quickly supported by Steve on that matter and this is how countrychooser came in. However, some voices objected that we indeed added one new screen (and sometimes two) while one of the major d-i guidelines has been to reduce the amount of user interaction involved. Petter Reinholdtsen was among those voices (though not alone). As I deeply respect Petter's work and give his opinion a high credit, a discussion then a compromise followed. This compromise is what is now in Debian Installer. However, we now see some more objections raised to this scheme (there are others such as the verbosity of the presented choices). So I think it's time we finally reconsider this and decide whether we keep the current scheme, with its defaults....and qualities (it is now well tested and quite solid)....or make a final move towards the "language then area/country" scheme, including changes to the language choice verbosity. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
