[huge CC list removed] On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 12:07:27AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 03:23:42PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:06:15PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 03:56:05PM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote: > > > > Greetings! Pardon my ignorance, but are the raid and SSE patches > > > > already backported into 2.2.25? I'm assuming Debian will continue to > > > > offer the 2.2 series. If so, and if .25 doesn't already contain them, > > > > the raid and SSE patches are important, I think -- the vm-global much > > > > less so. I can update these for the last 2.2 kernel if desired. > > > > > > The point of this cleanup is that Debian 3.1 will ship with > > > kernel 2.4 and 2.6, but not with kernel 2.2. > > > > > > The security team has already stated that they will not support three > > > major versions of the kernel in Debian 3.1. > > > > I'm sorry, I missed that statement, where did it occur? > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/debian-devel-200403/msg01495.html
Martin Schulze has since made statements amending this. -- G. Branden Robinson | Exercise your freedom of religion. Debian GNU/Linux | Set fire to a church of your [EMAIL PROTECTED] | choice. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
