On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 06:38:58PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > [ I've Cc'ed all maintainers of affected packages. ] > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:10:09AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 03:37:24AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > >... > > > It depends on the subarchitecture. In the installer, m68k-amiga uses > > > 2.4.20, m68k-mac uses 2.2.25. > > > > m68k now has 2.4.25 and 2.2.25 and uses these in d-i. All the older > > kernels can probably be removed, but I intended to wait until the > > maintainer returns from vacation to ask. > > > > m68k needs to keep 2.2 kernels for now. > > > Below is a list of kernel 2.2 packages (by source package) and packages > (build-)depending on them. > > > kernel 2.2 image packages packages: > > arm: > - kernel-image-2.2.19-netwinder > - kernel-image-2.2.19-riscpc > > m68k: > - kernel-image-2.2.25-amiga > - kernel-image-2.2.25-atari > - kernel-image-2.2.25-bvme6000 > - kernel-image-2.2.25-mac > - kernel-image-2.2.25-mac-udeb > - kernel-image-2.2.25-mvme147 > - kernel-image-2.2.25-mvme16x > > powerpc: > - kernel-image-2.2.10-powerpc-apus
This is only a woody package. It doesn't actually build in sarge anymore, and i have asked for the removal of this package (or the security team did so, will have to check) from sarge/sid in favor of the 2.4.x packages (2.4.20 actually in sarge/sid, 2.4.25 just uploaded). Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
