On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 04:26:30AM -0500, Rick_Thomas wrote: > Politics keeps them from requesting different country-codes. "Sigh!", > indeed, but that's a fact of life and we have to live with it. Calling > the different scripts by geographic designations will be sure to offend > people. As in the West, ownership of trademarks (in this case, the name > "China") is a hotly contested issue. It would be much safer to find a > neutral designation (such as "Traditional" and "Simplified") that > everybody can live with.
They *have* different country codes. The issue is that both languages claim the same *language* code, which is rather typical of this sort of politics, as regions will typically wish to be recognized as the one true holder of the standard for language $foo. The difference from the Norwegian case is quite clear, since in Norway, there is one country but two languages, so there's no sense in trying to fight a geopolitical battle over the language codes. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
