Quoting Nikolai Prokoschenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > 7. Partman again: it definitely needs more file systems! I had a > feeling I am installing Windows'95 as I could choose between two > FAT*-systems and one ext-system
As far as I can tell, filesystems support is supposed to be modular...so we need more modules added (but, please no more identical templates to translate-->the -basicfilesystems and -ext3 redundancy is painful enough) > > 8. Partman is ugly! I am sorry, this is my personal opinion after > seeing the version on the current sid-daily (rather shortly) - and > partman seems to need a new upload too :) My personal problems: > - There is no status about which partition is being edited. I think this is the worst problem. The high number of menus may be discussed, but some status is definitely needed as you very quickly end up completely lost..... > - No visual overview about which partitions are where, except for > the first screen, while it'd be more useful when changing some > partition! > - I think such small things like setting a bootable flag should not > take a whole menu item - it should be more like a checkbox. > Status is badly needed! Please report this as a bug against partman. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
