On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:45:03AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >2.6 will need a bit more maturity and better architecture support for > >that to happen though. Definitively post sarge release stuff. > This is a very bad idea, because more and more modern hardware will > require 2.6 kernels. If it's OK to support 2.2 kernels (!) for doorstops > then if there is somebody willing to do the work we should officially > support 2.6 kernels too, even if as a bf26 boot option. > A few days ago I fixed most .o/.ko issues, only kernel/linux-kernel-di/ > still needs some work.
Well, as far as i see, the problem is about the devfs stuff, and i guess this will need a consistent amount of work to fix it. If someone feels like doing it, fine with me, but i guess most d-i people are concentrating on other stuff. > By the time sarge is going to be frozen 2.6 kernels will be mature. Yeah, sure. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
