On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:02:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 06:42:28PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 04:21:56PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Ok, let's do it that way then. > > > > > > Bastian, how will you handle that ? Will libdi be able to understand > > > that powerpc_powermac is both of powerpc_powermac_oldworld and > > > powerpc_powermac_newworld, or something similar ? > > > > that it much more difficult then just make a string compare over the > > complete string. > > also this will make it impossible to specify powerpc_chrp without moving > > in powerpc_chrp_rs6k. > > So, if we go for the shorted case, i would choose : > > oldpmac, newpmac, prep, chrp, pegasos, chrp-rs6k (or rs6k ?) and apus.
or pmac, oldpmac, prep, chrp, pegasos, rs6k and apus for that matter. I have asked a rs6k owner to send us his /proc/cpuinfo file. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
