On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 06:42:28PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 04:21:56PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Ok, let's do it that way then. > > > > Bastian, how will you handle that ? Will libdi be able to understand > > that powerpc_powermac is both of powerpc_powermac_oldworld and > > powerpc_powermac_newworld, or something similar ? > > that it much more difficult then just make a string compare over the > complete string. > also this will make it impossible to specify powerpc_chrp without moving > in powerpc_chrp_rs6k.
So, if we go for the shorted case, i would choose : oldpmac, newpmac, prep, chrp, pegasos, chrp-rs6k (or rs6k ?) and apus. BTW, do we plan on supporting things like mbx or other kind of embedded powerpc subarches ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]