Martin Sjögren wrote: > Yes, fine, but I think it's a bad idea to change debconf from arch all > to arch any just to include the C interface. > > As I said, I see no problem splitting libdebconf in one backend and one > frontend part, and I think it's quite all right to have C backend > support installed along with debconf, but why can't debconf just depend > on the appropriate package(s)? I don't care whether the > debconfclient.[ch] files are in the debconf or cdebconf *source* > package.
I don't see much need for C debconf bindings being available for config scripts in debian (unless bash or libc really wants it to ask a question). It's fine if it is split off from cdebconf, but I don't think debconf will depend on it. -- see shy jo
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
